Pick any two words that you would remove from the English language, and why?
1) "Like"
This word has gotten on my nerves to many
times throughout presentations, speeches, and even in normal conversation. It’s
become a filler word, an obnoxious verbal tick that I cannot ignore whenever
someone has a lapse in thought, and I find myself being unable to focus on
anything else. Are there benefits to this word? Definitely. It has become a
common component of so many conversations throughout the world. However, its
ease of access has allowed for it to deviate from its normal usage, lurking
behind every inarticulate moment of human speech. This word isn’t irreplaceable
either – its versatility (which contributes to its ubiquity) means that there
are often better, more precise terms to use in its place. Want to draw a
comparison? Use “such as”. Want to express a favorable opinion towards something?
Use “enjoy” or “love”, more precise language for whatever situation it is.
Ultimately, the banishing of this word and replacing it with more precise,
fitting terms will make both human speech and literature much more articulate
and descriptive as a whole.
2) "Phlegm"
Rated as one of the most hated words in
the English language, and for good reason. In any situation where this word may
be used, “mucus” already has you covered done and there. So why go for this
disgusting word instead? Do writers really need to communicate that feeling of
a slug crawling in the back of your nasal passage? (though, it may be the
reason why you can’t pronounce the “g” in that word). Do they really need of
you to think of a thick, vile, greenish slime excreted from an organic,
pulsating orifice? The spelling of this word feels more redundant than the word
“Queue” (there’s four extra letters in there) and honestly shouldn’t exist in
the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment